Welcome to the Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics Program
This comprehensive digital resource serves as the official and sole reference for the Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics program at the College of Languages and Translation. Updated September 13, 2025, this page consolidates all program information, replacing all previous documentation and links.
For optimal viewing on mobile devices, please rotate your screen to landscape orientation to properly display tables and detailed program specifications.
Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics
Program Name: | Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics |
Program Code: | 030104 |
Qualification Level: | 7 |
Department: | Department of English Language |
College: | College of Languages and Translation |
Institution: | King Khalid University |
Program Specification: | New ☐ updated* ☑ |
Last Review Date: | September 2024 |
A. Program Identification and General Information
Postgraduate Studies Building, King Abdullah Road, Abha, King Khalid University
N/A
☐ Coursework & Thesis | ☑ Coursework |
☑ On Campus | ☐ Distance Education | ☐ Other _________ (specify) |
There is a signed cooperation agreement and educational partnership between the College of Languages and Translation and Talent Development Schools (Tatweer Almawaheba Schools).
- Language instructor
- Language curriculum developer/program director
- Language assessment and testing specialist
- University lecturer
- Discourse analyst
- Language policy advisor
- Educational institutions (schools, colleges, universities)
- Language institutes
- Adult education and TESOL/ESL programs
- Examination boards and testing organizations
- Higher education institutions
- Government ministries and agencies
- Curriculum development agencies
- Educational publishers
- Online learning platforms
- Corporate training departments
Major track/pathway | Credit hours (For each track) |
Professions/jobs (For each track) |
---|---|---|
1. Coursework & Research Project | 39 Credits | • Language instructor • Language curriculum developer/program director • Language assessment and testing specialist • University lecturer • Discourse analyst |
Exit points/awarded degree | Credit hours |
---|---|
1. N/A | N/A |
2. N/A | N/A |
3. N/A | N/A |
B. Mission, Goals, and Program Learning Outcomes
The Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics advances specialized expertise in language analysis, teaching, and policy through innovative research and applied practices. Our program equips students to address global and local linguistic challenges, emphasizing social responsibility, sustainable development, and impactful contributions to diverse communities and linguistic environments.
The Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics program aims to equip graduates with the skills and knowledge necessary to address complex linguistic challenges in diverse global and local contexts. The following goals guide the structure and outcomes of the program:
- Equip students with a deep understanding of core linguistic concepts, including language acquisition, discourse analysis, and sociolinguistics, to apply these theories to real-world challenges.
- Provide students with the tools and methodologies to conduct research in applied linguistics, fostering critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.
- Prepare students to design and implement effective language teaching methodologies, integrating modern pedagogical strategies and curriculum development tailored to diverse learning environments.
- Enable students to analyse and propose solutions for contemporary language-related issues, such as language policy, assessment, and planning, with a focus on sustainable development and social responsibility.
- Prepare students to become leaders in the field of applied linguistics, contributing to academic, governmental, and private sector organizations through impactful language education, research, and policy development.
- Instill a sense of integrity and responsibility in students, emphasizing the ethical dimensions of language use
Knowledge and Understanding:
Skills:
Values, Autonomy, and Responsibility:
C. Curriculum
Program Structure | Required/Elective | No. of courses | Credit Hours | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|
Course | Required | 9 | 28 | 71.79% |
Elective | 2 | 6 | 15.38 | |
Graduation Project (if any) | Required | 1 | 5 | 12.82 % |
Thesis (if any) | ||||
Field Experience (if any) | ||||
Others (....) | ||||
Total | 12 | 39 | 100% |
Level | Course Code | Course Title | Required or Elective | Pre-Requisite Course | Credit Hours | Type of requirements | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
University, College, or Program | |||||||
Level 1 | 6521 ENGL-3 | Concepts in Applied Linguistics | Required | N/A | 3 | Program | |
6522 ENG-3 | Language Acquisition | Required | N/A | 3 | Program | ||
6523 ENG-3 | Sociolinguistics | Required | N/A | 3 | Program | ||
6524 ENG-3 | Discourse Analysis | Required | N/A | 3 | Program | ||
Level 2 | 6525 ENGL-3 | Language Assessment and Testing | Required | 6521 ENGL-3 | 3 | Program | |
6526 ENGL-3 | Language Pedagogy and Curriculum Development | Required | 6521 ENG-3 | 3 | Program | ||
6527 ENGL-4 | Research Methods and Training | Required | N/A | 4 | Program | ||
Level 3 | 6528 ENGL-3 | Language Policy and Planning | Required | N/A | 3 | Program | |
6529 ENGL-3 | Computer Assisted Language Learning | Elective | 6521 ENG-3 | 3 | Program | ||
6530 ENG-3 | Psycholinguistics | Elective | 3 | Program | |||
6531 ENG-3 | Teaching Practicum | Required | 6521 ENGL-3, 6526 ENGL-3 | 3 | Program | ||
Level 4 | 6532 ENG-3 | Second Language Pragmatics | Elective | 6521 ENGL-3 | 3 | Program | |
6533 ENG-3 | Introduction to Forensic Linguistics | Elective | 6521 ENGL-3 | 3 | Program | ||
6534 ENG-5 | Graduation Project | Required | 6527 ENGL-4 | 5 | Program |
Insert hyperlink for all course specifications using NCAAA template (T-104)
Align the program learning outcomes with the program's courses according to the desired performance levels.
(I = Introduced, P = Practiced, M = Mastered)
Course Code & No. | Program Learning Outcomes | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge & Understanding | Skills | Values, Autonomy & Responsibility | |||||||||
K1 | K2 | K3 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | V1 | V2 | V3 | ||
6521 ENGL-3 | M | I | I | P | P | P | I | I | I | ||
6522 ENG-3 | P | M | I | P | I | P | P | P | |||
6523 ENG-3 | P | M | P | P | |||||||
6524 ENG-3 | M | M | P | P | P | ||||||
6525 ENGL-3 | M | M | M | P | P | ||||||
6526 ENGL-3 | M | P | M | P | M | P | |||||
6527 ENGL-4 | M | M | P | M | M | ||||||
6528 ENGL-3 | M | M | P | P | P | P | M | ||||
6529 ENGL-3 | M | P | |||||||||
6530 ENGL-3 | P | P | P | P | |||||||
6531 ENG-3 | P | M | P | P | P | ||||||
6532 ENG-3 | P | M | P | P | M | ||||||
6533ENG-3 | M | M | M | ||||||||
6534 ENG-5 | M | M | P | M | M |
I = Introduced | P = Practiced | M = Mastered
Describe teaching and learning strategies to achieve the program's learning outcomes in all areas:
To achieve the program learning outcomes, the Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics employs a variety of teaching and learning strategies. These approaches are designed to foster deep understanding, critical thinking, and practical application of linguistic knowledge in real-world contexts. The following strategies guide the learning process:
- Lectures and seminars
- Interactive class discussions
- Case studies and problem-solving exercises
- Research projects and assignments
- Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) tools
- Group projects and collaborative learning
- Workshops on research methods and data analysis
- Fieldwork and real-world observation
- Peer review and feedback sessions
- Readings and textbook assignments
Describe assessment methods (Direct and indirect) that can be used to measure the achievement of program learning outcomes at all areas.
The program should devise a plan for assessing Program Learning Outcomes (all learning outcomes should be assessed at least once in the program cycle).
The program uses a combination of direct and indirect assessment methods to measure the achievement of learning outcomes across all areas. Each learning outcome is assessed at least once during the program cycle, ensuring comprehensive evaluation of student knowledge and skills. The following methods outline the plan for assessing program learning outcomes:
Direct assessment methods:
- Examinations
- Research projects and papers
- Oral presentations
- Graduation project
- Course-specific assignments
Indirect assessment methods:
- Student surveys and feedback
- Exit surveys
- Alumni surveys
- Employer feedback
- Focus group discussions
- Self-assessment and reflection
D. Thesis and Its Requirements (if any)
(Requirements/conditions and procedures for registration of the thesis as well as controls, responsibilities and procedures of scientific guidance)
Not Applicable
(The regulations of the selection of the academic supervisor and their responsibilities; as well as the procedures/mechanisms of the scientific supervision and follow-up)
Not Applicable
(The regulations for formation of the defence/examination committee and the requirements to proceed for thesis defence, the procedures for defence and approval of the thesis, and criteria for evaluation of the thesis)
Not Applicable
H. Student Admission and Support
In addition to meeting the requirements stated in the Unified Regulations for Postgraduate Studies in Saudi Universities, the applicant has to:
1. Have a B. A. in language, with a GPA not less than 3.75 out of 5
2. Achieve the required score in any one of the following standardized tests:
a. TOEFL Test with a minimum score of (IBT 79), STEP (97), or IELTS (06)
b. Postgraduate General Aptitude Test (PGAT) with a minimum score of 60%
The Department and College Councils have the right to add any condition, if necessary.
(Include only the exceptional needs offered to the students of the program that differ from those provided at the institutional level).
Guidance and orientation programs for new students
The Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics program offers specialized guidance and orientation programs tailored to meet the unique academic and professional needs of students entering the program. These initiatives are designed to go beyond the general support provided at the institutional level, addressing the specific demands of graduate-level study in applied linguistics.
- Customized Academic Orientation
Upon entry into the program, students participate in a comprehensive orientation session focused on the advanced linguistic theories, research methodologies, and practical applications they will encounter. This session introduces students to key faculty members, curriculum, electives, and expectations for academic work, helping them make informed decisions about their academic path. - Personalized Academic Advising
Each student is assigned a dedicated academic advisor from the faculty with expertise in applied linguistics. Advisors guide students through course selection, research planning, and career development. This individualized support ensures that students receive tailored advice based on their academic background and career aspirations. - Research Preparation Workshops
The program offers exclusive workshops that focus on preparing students for the research components of their degree. These workshops cover key areas such as research design, data analysis, and academic writing, providing the foundational skills required to excel in their research projects. - Access to Specialized Linguistic Tools and Resources
Students are given early orientation on how to utilize specialized software and resources essential for linguistics research, such as corpus analysis tools, computational linguistics platforms, and access to advanced language databases. This guidance helps students to engage with research materials and technologies specific to the field.
- Cultural and Language Transition Support
For international students or those unfamiliar with the academic and cultural environment, the program provides additional support to ease their transition. This includes guidance on academic norms, expectations in language education research, and integration into the university’s linguistic community.
- Mentorship Programs
New students are paired with senior students or faculty members who serve as mentors, providing guidance on navigating the challenges of graduate study. These mentors offer insights into managing academic workloads, selecting research topics, and balancing professional development with coursework.
(Academic, professional, psychological and social)
(Include only the exceptional needs offered to the students of the program that differ from those provided at the institutional level)
The Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics program provides specialized support across academic, professional, psychological, and social dimensions that are specifically tailored to the needs of graduate students in this field. These services go beyond the standard institutional offerings, ensuring that students have a smooth transition into the program and succeed throughout their academic journey.
1. Academic Support
- Advanced Research Methodology Workshops
In addition to general academic resources, the program offers specialized workshops that focus on research methodologies unique to linguistics, data analysis, and thesis writing. These workshops are designed to address the unique academic challenges that applied linguistics students face, helping them develop the skills necessary to complete complex research projects and theses. - Individualized Learning Plans
Students who require additional academic support or have diverse educational backgrounds are provided with personalized learning plans. These plans help them to meet the rigorous academic standards of the program and fill any gaps in prior knowledge.
2. Professional Development:
- Professional Networking Events
Exclusive networking events are arranged for students, bringing together applied linguistics professionals, alumni, and industry experts. These events provide opportunities to make connections, gain insights into industry trends, and explore career options specific to their field.
3. Psychological Support:
- Tailored Counseling Services
Recognizing the unique stresses associated with graduate-level research, the program offers additional psychological counseling services tailored to linguistics students. These services include one-on-one counseling sessions focusing on managing research-related stress, dealing with academic pressure, and maintaining work-life balance. - Workshops on Stress Management
Periodic workshops specifically designed for MAAL students focus on techniques for managing stress, maintaining motivation, and balancing the demands of academic, professional, and personal responsibilities. This support is critical during high-pressure periods such as thesis preparation or project deadlines.
4. Social Integration and Support:
- Cross-Cultural Integration Support
For international students or those transitioning into a new cultural environment, the program offers additional support through cross-cultural workshops and social events. These sessions help students adjust to the social and academic expectations of the university, fostering a welcoming and inclusive atmosphere.
(Low achievers, disabled, and talented students)
(Include only the exceptional needs offered to the students of the program that differ from those provided at the institutional level)
The Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics program provides specialized support tailored to meet the needs of diverse learner groups. These services are designed to ensure that all students, regardless of their challenges or exceptional abilities, have opportunities to succeed, regardless of their unique challenges or abilities.
Support for Students in Need:
- Individualized Learning Plans
Students requiring additional academic support with personalized learning plans that focus on identifying academic weaknesses and addressing them through tailored interventions. This may include extra tutoring sessions, more frequent academic advising, and specialized workshops focused on language skills and study techniques. - Additional Tutoring and Mentoring
Continuous assessment and monitoring of students' academic performance help identify those who may be struggling early in the intervention process. Students are introduced to various thesis support options, which may include tutoring sessions and small group workshops.
Support for Students with Disabilities:
- Adaptive Learning Materials
The program ensures that all learning materials are available in accessible formats, such as digital, large print, or audio versions for students with visual, auditory, or cognitive learning differences. Classroom environments and online platforms are designed to accommodate various disabilities. - Flexible Assessment Accommodations
Students with disabilities are provided with individualized accommodation plans that may include extended time for assignments and exams, accessible seating arrangements, and adaptive technology to support their studies. - Counseling and Support Services
The program collaborates with the university's disability services, the program offers counseling and emotional support tailored to the unique challenges faced by students with disabilities that students navigate the academic challenges they may face while fostering a supportive, encouraging educational environment.
Support for Talented Students:
- Advanced Research Opportunities
Talented students are given access to advanced research opportunities, including working alongside faculty on cutting-edge projects. This allows them to further develop their skills and gain research experiences that may lead to publications and professional engagements, mentorships of TESOL conventions. - Leadership and Presentation Opportunities
Talented students are encouraged to take on leadership roles in academic conferences, present their research, and take on leadership roles in student organizations or research groups. This helps to build their professional profiles and prepare them for leadership roles in academia or industry.
E. Faculty and Administrative Staff
Academic Rank | Specialty | Special Requirements / Skills (if any) | Required Numbers | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General | Specific | M | F | T | ||
Professor | Applied Linguistics | TESOL/Linguistics/ Sociolinguistics |
- | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Associate Professor | Applied Linguistics | TESOL/Linguistics/ Discourse analysis |
- | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Assistant Professor | Applied Linguistics | CALL Language Planning |
- | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Technicians and Laboratory Assistant | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Administrative and Supportive Staff | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 |
F. Learning Resources, Facilities, and Equipment
Learning resources required by the program (textbooks, references, e-learning resources, web-based resources, etc.)
- Textbooks and academic references
- Journals and academic databases
- E-learning platforms and tools
- Web-based resources
- Software for data analysis
- Language learning tools
- Research methodology resources
(Library, laboratories, classrooms, etc.)
- Library facilities
- Computer laboratories
- Classrooms
- Language laboratories
- E-learning and virtual classrooms
- Conference rooms
(According to the nature of the program)
- Health and safety policies
- Regular facility inspections
- Emergency procedures and training
- Accessibility and ergonomics
- Mental health support services
- Sanitation and hygiene protocols
- First aid and medical assistance
- Ventilation and air quality
G. Program Quality Assurance
Provide a link to the quality assurance manual.
- Regular program reviews
- Course evaluation by students
- Faculty performance reviews
- External examiner/reviewer feedback
- Alumni feedback and surveys
- Employer feedback on graduate competency
- NCAAA accreditation standards and required forms
- Benchmarking against similar programs
- Analysis of student performance data
- Curriculum review and updates
All courses of the programme are taught by faculty members of the English Department
The Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics program at King Khalid University operates as a co-educational program, hosting both male and female students in the same classes. These students are taught by both male and female faculty members. To ensure consistency in academic quality and learning outcomes across this integrated environment, the following procedures are implemented:
1. Unified Curriculum and Course Delivery
- A standardized curriculum is followed for all students, regardless of gender. This ensures that both male and female students are exposed to the same course materials, learning objectives, and academic content.
- Courses are taught using the same syllabus, assignments, grading criteria, and teaching methods, whether male or female, are expected to adhere to these standards, ensuring uniformity in content delivery.
2. Equal Teaching Opportunities
- Both male and female faculty members teach mixed-gender classes, ensuring that all students have access to a diverse range of teaching perspectives and expertise.
- Faculty members collaborate across gender lines to share teaching resources, strategies, and insights, promoting a cohesive and unified learning environment.
3. Shared Learning Resources and Access
- All students, whether male or female, have equal access to the university's learning resources, including the Learning Management System (LMS), digital library services, and digital learning tools that everyone has the same opportunity to succeed academically.
- The Saudi Digital Library and other academic databases are equally accessible to all students, promoting equality in research and study opportunities.
4. Standardized Assessment and Grading
- All assessments, including exams, quizzes, and assignments, are the same for male and female students, with consistent grading rubrics applied to both.
- A standardized grading system ensures that both male and female students are assessed based on identical criteria, promoting fairness and transparency in evaluation.
5. Collaborative Learning and Group Work
- In-class group activities, discussions, and projects encourage collaboration between male and female students. This inclusive approach fosters a collaborative learning environment that benefits from diverse perspectives and teamwork.
- Group projects and research assignments are designed to ensure that all students engage equally, regardless of gender, promoting a unified academic experience.
6. Equal Academic and Professional Support
- Both male and female students receive equal access to academic advising, mentoring, and faculty office hours. Advisors are assigned without regard to gender to provide non-biased academic, professional, and career development support.
- Professional development workshops, research opportunities, and extracurricular activities are open to all students, ensuring equal opportunities for growth and learning.
7. Inclusive Classroom Environment
- Faculty members are trained to foster an inclusive classroom environment where both male and female students feel respected and valued. This includes promoting active participation from all students, ensuring that discussions and classroom activities are free from bias and are inclusive.
- Faculty are encouraged to use teaching methods that engage all students equally, ensuring a fair and supportive learning atmosphere.
8. Monitoring and Feedback
- Regular feedback from students is collected to ensure that the co-educational setting meets the academic and social needs of all participants. This feedback is used to continually improve the learning environment and address any issues that may arise.
- Faculty receive training on creating inclusive and equitable educational experiences in the co-educational setting, ensuring that both male and female students receive equal treatment and opportunities for academic success.
The evaluation of Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs), which are mapped to the Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs), is an integral part of the course's evaluation and assessment plan. This process ensures that all PLOs are assessed to contribute effectively to the achievement of the broader program outcomes. Here's how the evaluation is structured:
1. Direct Assessment of CLOs
- Student performance on course exams, quizzes, assignments, and projects is directly linked to specific CLOs. Each CLO is assessed through measurable criteria (e.g., scores on specific questions or sections of exams), and this data is analyzed to determine the success of the course in meeting its intended learning outcomes.
- Standardized rubrics are used for assignments, presentations, and projects to evaluate students' mastery of CLOs. These rubrics are aligned with both the CLOs and PLOs, ensuring consistency in assessment and clarity in expectations.
2. Mapping of CLOs to PLOs
- Each course in the program has its CLOs mapped to specific PLOs. By reviewing how the CLOs contribute to the achievement of PLOs, the program administration can identify gaps or areas for improvement in both the course and program structure.
- Curriculum committees periodically review the mapping of CLOs to PLOs to ensure that courses are aligned with the overall program goals. This review ensures that students need adjustments in course content, teaching strategies, or assessment methods to better contribute to the PLOs.
3. Course Evaluation Forms
- At the end of each course, students' complete evaluation surveys where they assess how well the course helped them meet the specific CLOs. These forms include sections on course content, teaching methods, and assessment. This feedback provides data on whether courses are aligned with achieving the intended PLOs.
4. Analysis and Reporting
- The results of the CLO assessments are aggregated across multiple courses to evaluate how well students are achieving the mapped PLOs. Each CLO is analyzed to determine overall program effectiveness.
- The aggregated data on CLO and PLO achievement is presented during English Department Council meetings, providing a basis for decisions on curriculum adjustments, teaching methods, and resource allocation.
5. Continuous Improvement
- Based on the evaluation of CLOs and their contribution to PLOs, instructors and program coordinators develop improvement plans for individual courses. These plans may involve revising the curriculum, altering assessment methods, or introducing new teaching strategies.
- If data shows that certain PLOs are not being met across multiple courses, the program leadership may revise the overall curriculum or introduce new learning opportunities to strengthen those outcomes.
Evaluation Areas/Aspects | Evaluation Sources/References | Evaluation Methods | Evaluation Time |
---|---|---|---|
Effectiveness of teaching | Faculty members, students, program leaders, course evaluation | Survey, observation, PLOs assessment | End of academic year |
Effectiveness of assessment methods and tools | Faculty members, students | Alumni survey, focus group interview | End of academic year |
Learning resources | Students, faculty members, administrators, library staff | Surveys, observation, focus group interview | End of academic year |
Effectiveness of students | Students, faculty members, administrators | Surveys, focus group interview | End of academic year |
Overall quality of the program | PLOs, teaching assessment, surveys, assessment | Course reports, program reports | End of academic year |
Evaluation Areas/Aspects (e.g., leadership, effectiveness of teaching & assessment, learning resources, services, partnerships, etc.)
Evaluation Sources (students, graduates, alumni, faculty, program leaders, administrative staff, employers, independent reviewers, and others)
Evaluation Methods (e.g., surveys, interviews, visits, etc.)
Evaluation Time (e.g., beginning of semesters, end of the academic year, etc.)
The period to achieve the target (____) year(s).
No. | KPIs Code | KPIs | Targeted Level | Measurement Methods | Measurement Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | KPI-PG-1 | Students' Evaluation of quality of learning experience in the program | 4.5 | • Student Surveys and Questionnaires • Focus Group Discussions • Course Evaluation Forms • Alumni Surveys • Thesis and Research Project Feedback |
In the middle and end of each academic year |
2 | KPI-PG-2 | Students' evaluation of the quality of the courses | 4.50 | • Student Surveys and Questionnaires • Focus Group Discussions • Course Evaluation Forms • Alumni Surveys • Thesis and Research Project Feedback |
At the end of each semester |
3 | KPI-PG-3 | Students' Evaluation of the Quality of Academic Supervision | 4.20 | • Supervision Evaluation Surveys • Mid-Project Feedback Forms • Focus Group Discussions • Exit Interviews or Surveys • Alumni Feedback |
At the end of each academic year |
4 | KPI-PG-4 | Average time (in semesters) spent by students to graduate from the program | 4 semesters | Statistical data analysis based on data received from the registrar | At the end of each two academic year |
5 | KPI-PG-5 | Rate of Students Dropping Out of the Program | 5% or less | Statistical data analysis based on data received from the registrar | At the beginning of each academic year |
6 | KPI-PG-6 | Employers' Evaluation of the Program Graduates' Competency | 4.30 | • Employer Feedback Surveys • Interviews with Employers • Industry Focus Group Discussions • Job Performance Assessments • Alumni Employment Tracking and Feedback |
Annually |
7 | KPI-PG-7 | Students' Satisfaction with Services Provided | 4.40 | • Student Satisfaction Surveys • Focus Group Discussions • Feedback Forms on Support Services • Exit Surveys • Service-Specific Evaluation (e.g., library, IT, advising) |
At the end of each academic year |
8 | KPI-PG-8 | Ratio of students to faculty members | One faculty member to 3 students | Statistical data analysis based on data received from the registrar | At the end of each academic year |
9 | KPI-PG-9 | Percentage of Publications of Faculty Members | 75% | Statistical data analysis | Annually |
10 | KPI-PG-10 | Rate of Published Research per Faculty Member | 2 | Statistical data analysis collected via survey | Annually |
11 | KPI-PG-11 | Citations Rate in Refereed Journals per Faculty Member | 5 citations per faculty member | Google scholar report ResearchGate report Scopus report Publication report |
Annually |
12 | KPI-PG-12 | Percentage of Students' Publication | 30% | Statistical data analysis | Within six months of graduation |
13 | KPI-PG-13 | Number of Patents, Innovative Products, and Awards of Excellence | 2 | Survey | Annually |
* Including KPIs required by NCAAA
H. Specification Approval Data
Council / Committee | English Department Council |
Reference No. | 1/5/46 |
Date | October 14, 2024 |